Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: mediatek: add SCPSYS power domain driver for MediaTek MT7622 SoC
From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Tue Aug 01 2017 - 10:58:54 EST
On 08/01/2017 12:06 PM, sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Chen Zhong <chen.zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add SCPSYS power domain driver for MT7622 SoC having four power domains
which are respectively ETHSYS for Ethernet including embedded switch,
WBSYS for WIFI and Bluetooth, HIF0SYS for PCI-E and SATA, and HIF1SYS for
USB. Those functions could be selectively powered gated when the
corresponding function is no longer to use in order to reach more minimal
power dissipation.
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhong <chen.zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h | 8 +++-
2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index ceb2cc4..513aa73 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <dt-bindings/power/mt2701-power.h>
#include <dt-bindings/power/mt6797-power.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/power/mt7622-power.h>
#include <dt-bindings/power/mt8173-power.h>
#define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON 0x0210
@@ -39,6 +40,11 @@
#define SPM_MFG_2D_PWR_CON 0x02c0
#define SPM_MFG_ASYNC_PWR_CON 0x02c4
#define SPM_USB_PWR_CON 0x02cc
+#define SPM_ETHSYS_PWR_CON 0x02e0 /* MT7622 */
+#define SPM_HIF0_PWR_CON 0x02e4 /* MT7622 */
+#define SPM_HIF1_PWR_CON 0x02e8 /* MT7622 */
+#define SPM_WB_PWR_CON 0x02ec /* MT7622 */
+
#define SPM_PWR_STATUS 0x060c
#define SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND 0x0610
@@ -64,6 +70,10 @@
#define PWR_STATUS_MFG_ASYNC BIT(23)
#define PWR_STATUS_AUDIO BIT(24)
#define PWR_STATUS_USB BIT(25)
+#define PWR_STATUS_ETHSYS BIT(24) /* MT7622 */
+#define PWR_STATUS_HIF0 BIT(25) /* MT7622 */
+#define PWR_STATUS_HIF1 BIT(26) /* MT7622 */
+#define PWR_STATUS_WB BIT(27) /* MT7622 */
enum clk_id {
CLK_NONE,
@@ -73,6 +83,7 @@ enum clk_id {
CLK_VENC_LT,
CLK_ETHIF,
CLK_VDEC,
+ CLK_HIFSEL,
CLK_MAX,
};
@@ -84,6 +95,7 @@ static const char * const clk_names[] = {
"venc_lt",
"ethif",
"vdec",
+ "hif_sel",
NULL,
};
@@ -696,6 +708,72 @@ static int __init scpsys_probe_mt6797(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/*
+ * MT7622 power domain support
+ */
+static const struct scp_domain_data scp_domain_data_mt7622[] = {
+ [MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_ETHSYS] = {
+ .name = "ethsys",
+ .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_ETHSYS,
+ .ctl_offs = SPM_ETHSYS_PWR_CON,
+ .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
+ .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
+ .clk_id = {CLK_NONE},
+ .bus_prot_mask = MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_ETHSYS,
+ .active_wakeup = true,
+ },
+ [MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_HIF0] = {
+ .name = "hif0",
+ .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_HIF0,
+ .ctl_offs = SPM_HIF0_PWR_CON,
+ .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
+ .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
+ .clk_id = {CLK_HIFSEL},
+ .bus_prot_mask = MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_HIF0,
+ .active_wakeup = true,
+ },
+ [MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_HIF1] = {
+ .name = "hif1",
+ .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_HIF1,
+ .ctl_offs = SPM_HIF1_PWR_CON,
+ .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
+ .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
+ .clk_id = {CLK_HIFSEL},
+ .bus_prot_mask = MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_HIF1,
+ .active_wakeup = true,
+ },
+ [MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB] = {
+ .name = "wb",
+ .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_WB,
+ .ctl_offs = SPM_WB_PWR_CON,
+ .sram_pdn_bits = 0,
+ .sram_pdn_ack_bits = 0,
+ .clk_id = {CLK_NONE},
+ .bus_prot_mask = MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_WB,
+ .active_wakeup = true,
+ },
+};
+
+#define NUM_DOMAINS_MT7622 ARRAY_SIZE(scp_domain_data_mt7622)
+
+static int __init scpsys_probe_mt7622(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct scp *scp;
+ struct scp_ctrl_reg scp_reg;
+
+ scp_reg.pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS;
+ scp_reg.pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND;
+
+ scp = init_scp(pdev, scp_domain_data_mt7622, NUM_DOMAINS_MT7622,
+ &scp_reg);
+ if (IS_ERR(scp))
+ return PTR_ERR(scp);
+
+ mtk_register_power_domains(pdev, scp, NUM_DOMAINS_MT7622);
+
+ return 0;
+}
All the scpsys_probe_mtXXXX are following the same pattern, which get's really
obvious when comparing this function to scpsys_probe_mt2701.
Instead of adding the scpsys_probe_mtXXXX callback to the of_device_id data
pointer, couldn't we pass a struct with a pointer to the scp_domain_data_mtXXXX
array and a possible callback to register the subdomains?
This would reduce code duplication for every new SoC, which starts to bloat the
driver.
Can you implement this as a separate patch of this series? Or do you prefer me
to do so and you just rebase your series on top of that?
Regards,
Matthias
+
+/*
* MT8173 power domain support
*/
@@ -835,6 +913,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_scpsys_match_tbl[] = {
.compatible = "mediatek,mt6797-scpsys",
.data = scpsys_probe_mt6797,
}, {
+ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-scpsys",
+ .data = scpsys_probe_mt7622,
+ }, {
.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-scpsys",
.data = scpsys_probe_mt8173,
}, {
diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
index a5714e9..c1e5062 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
@@ -20,7 +20,13 @@
#define MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M1 BIT(22)
#define MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_SNOOP_OUT BIT(23)
+#define MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_ETHSYS (BIT(3) | BIT(17))
+#define MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_HIF0 (BIT(24) | BIT(25))
+#define MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_HIF1 (BIT(26) | BIT(27) | \
+ BIT(28))
+#define MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_WB (BIT(2) | BIT(6) | \
+ BIT(7) | BIT(8))
+
int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask);
int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask);
-
#endif /* __SOC_MEDIATEK_INFRACFG_H */