Re: [PATCH 2/3] jump_labels: do not use unserialized static_key_enabled

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue Aug 01 2017 - 16:52:23 EST


On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 17:24 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Any use of key->enabled (that is static_key_enabled and static_key_count)
> outside jump_label_lock should handle its own serialization. The only
> two that are not doing so are the UDP encapsulation static keys. Change
> them to use static_key_enable, which now correctly tests key->enabled under
> the jump label lock.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/static-keys.txt | 5 +++++
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +--
> net/ipv6/udp.c | 3 +--
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/static-keys.txt b/Documentation/static-keys.txt
> index ef419fd0897f..181998852961 100644
> --- a/Documentation/static-keys.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/static-keys.txt
> @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@ static_branch_inc(), will change the branch back to true. Likewise, if the
> key is initialized false, a 'static_branch_inc()', will change the branch to
> true. And then a 'static_branch_dec()', will again make the branch false.
>
> +The state and the reference count can be retrieved with 'static_key_enabled()'
> +and 'static_key_count()'. In general, if you use these functions, they
> +should be protected with the same mutex used around the enable/disable
> +or increment/decrement function.
> +
> Where an array of keys is required, it can be defined as:
>
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_TRUE(keys, count);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 1d6219bf2d6b..74b7810df9fc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1644,8 +1644,7 @@ static int __udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> static struct static_key udp_encap_needed __read_mostly;
> void udp_encap_enable(void)
> {
> - if (!static_key_enabled(&udp_encap_needed))
> - static_key_slow_inc(&udp_encap_needed);
> + static_key_enable(&udp_encap_needed);
> }

Looks good to me, but static_key_enable() is not serialized either ?

I suspect you should have CCed me on patch 1/3 :)