Re: [PATCH 058/102] phy: rockchip-pcie: explicitly request exclusive reset control

[Shawn Lin]

[+ Bjorn]

On 2017/7/19 23:26, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
> reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
> to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
> control behavior. Convert all drivers requesting exclusive resets to the
> explicit API call so the temporary transition helpers can be removed.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

some changes for phy-rockchip-pcie.c would go via pci tree
for 4.14, so is it ok for Bjorn to pick this up if no objection
from Kishon, in case of merge conflict?

Anyway,

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> index 6904633cad687..258220b7f481c 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	rk_phy->phy_data = (struct rockchip_pcie_data *)of_id->data;
>   	rk_phy->reg_base = grf;
>   
> -	rk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "phy");
> +	rk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "phy");
>   	if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst)) {
>   		if (PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>   			dev_err(dev,