On 08/04, Yunlong Song wrote:
Since __write_data_page will not do f2fs_balance_fs for dir inode, so thereWhat I wanted to say was we cannot add f2fs_balance_fs() in my proposed approach
is no lock.
- f2fs_balance_fs
- __write_data_page (dir inode)
- f2fs_balance_fs again? <- Can not happen!
And if let sync_dirty_inodes flush dentry page of inodeB, then inodeB will
sikp the
f2fs_balance_fs check due to the same reason above (it is dir inode).
due to livelock.
Besides, does any lock will lock the kernel writeback process? If not, whenAgain, I'm asking why this normal writeback should call f2fs_balance_fs().
normal
writeback of inodeB just happens before sync_dirty_inodes fetch it from the
dirty_list,
the normal writeback of indoeB will skip the f2fs_balance_fs check.
We must flush all the dirty dentry pages in inodeB to finalize checkpoint.
Who is able to make dirty dentry pages at this moment?
f2fs_trim(,sync)_fs normal dentry page writeback.
of inodeB
-- write_checkpoint --f2fs_write_data_pages
--block_operations --f2fs_write_cache_pages
--SBI_BLOCK_OPS is set --__write_data_page
--sync_dirty_inodes --test SBI_BLOCK_OPS is set and skip
f2fs_balance_fs
--retry: write to reserved segments
inodeA <- list_first_entry(dirty_list)
filemap_fdatawrite(inodeA)
go to retry
--SBI_BLOCK_OPS is clear
On 2017/8/4 9:57, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 08/02, Yunlong Song wrote:--
Hi Jay,If there are not enough sections, all the possible system calls were already
The case is like this:
write_checkpoint: normal dentry
page writeback of inodeBï
-block_operations -f2fs_write_data_pages
-SBI_BLOCK_OPS is set -f2fs_write_cache_pages
-sync_dirty_inodes -__write_data_page
-retry: -test SBI_BLOCK_OPS is set and skip
f2fs_balance_fs
inodeA <- list_first_entry(dirty_list)
filemap_fdatawrite(inodeA)
goto retry
-SBI_BLOCK_OPS is clear
write_checkpoint flow call sync_dirty_inodes to traversal the dirty inode
list and filemap_fdatawrite each inode,
during this period, if normal dentry_page writeback is processing inodeB,
and syc_dirty_inodes is processing
inodeA, then inodeB writeback flow will skip f2fs_balance_fs and may write
the dentry page to reserved segments.
blocked by gc_mutex. So, it doesn't have to do f2fs_balance_fs(), and let
sync_dirty_inodes() flush dentry pages of inodeB.
Oh, does it make livelock?
- f2fs_balance_fs
- f2fs_gc
- write_checkpoint
- sync_dirty_inodes
- filemap_fdatawrite(inodeB)
- __write_data_page
- f2fs_balance_fs again?
On 2017/8/2 2:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:.
On 08/01, Yunlong Song wrote:--
Hi Jay,Why not? There must be no dirty dentry pages after sync_dirty_inodes() in that
The SBI_BLOCK_OPS can not cover all the case, once SBI_BLOCK_OPS is set,
all the normal writeback
(before the SBI_BLOCK_OPS is clear) of dentry pages which do not come from
write_checkpoint flow will
totally miss all the f2fs_balance_fs check.
period which we grabbed the globla lock.
Thanks,
On 2017/7/31 0:05, Yunlong Song wrote:.
Hi Jay,--
Chao has pointed out one reason, besides, I have another reason: we
should take care of writeback for f2fs_balance_fs carefully, because if
some bugs cause reserved segments unlikely used, which means
f2fs_balance_fs does not work or is skipped in some corner case that we
have not noticed or found out yet, then the reserved segments may be
continually used and even used up in the writeback process of dentry
page, since current design believe in the f2fs_balance_fs in system
call and has no check in denty page writeback. To avoid this, we can put
a f2fs_balance_fs in the dentry page writeback process to give f2fs more
robust in free segments reserved. This is worth, because free segments
reserved are so important, if they are used up, f2fs will enter a
totally wrong status and make a wrong image.
On 07/30/2017 15:31, Jaegeuk Kim <mailto:jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/29, Yunlong Song wrote:
> f2fs_balance_fs of dentry pages is skipped in __write_data_page
due to deadlock
> of gc_mutex in write_checkpoint flow. This patch enables
f2fs_balance_fs for
> normal dentry page writeback to ensure there are always enough
free segments.
Sorry, by the way, why do we need to do this? I subtly thought
that dirty node
pages can be produce by redirtied inodes from what we've not
covered through
filesystem calls. But, in dentry pages, we're controlling the
number of dirty
pages, and calling f2fs_balance_fs in each directory operations.
Chao?
Thanks,
>
> Reported-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 67
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 3c84a25..2882878 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ int sync_dirty_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info
*sbi, enum inode_type type)
> if (inode) {
> unsigned long cur_ino = inode->i_ino;
>
> - filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping);
> + f2fs_filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping, is_dir);
> iput(inode);
> /* We need to give cpu to another writers. */
> if (ino == cur_ino) {
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index aefc2a5..ed7efa5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ int do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info
*fio)
> }
>
> static int __write_data_page(struct page *page, bool *submitted,
> - struct writeback_control *wbc)
> + struct writeback_control *wbc, bool do_balance)
> {
> struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> @@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ static int __write_data_page(struct page
*page, bool *submitted,
> }
>
> unlock_page(page);
> - if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> + if (do_balance)
> f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, need_balance_fs);
>
> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> @@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static int __write_data_page(struct page
*page, bool *submitted,
> static int f2fs_write_data_page(struct page *page,
> struct writeback_control *wbc)
> {
> - return __write_data_page(page, NULL, wbc);
> + return __write_data_page(page, NULL, wbc, true);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_page(struct
page *page,
> * warm/hot data page.
> */
> static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> - struct writeback_control *wbc)
> + struct writeback_control *wbc, bool
do_balance)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> int done = 0;
> @@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct
address_space *mapping,
> if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
> goto continue_unlock;
>
> - ret = __write_data_page(page, &submitted, wbc);
> + ret = __write_data_page(page, &submitted, wbc,
do_balance);
> if (unlikely(ret)) {
> /*
> * keep nr_to_write, since vfs uses this to
> @@ -1756,8 +1756,8 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct
address_space *mapping,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> - struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +static int _f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc, bool do_balance)
> {
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> @@ -1794,7 +1794,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct
address_space *mapping,
> goto skip_write;
>
> blk_start_plug(&plug);
> - ret = f2fs_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc);
> + ret = f2fs_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, do_balance);
> blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>
> if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> @@ -1813,6 +1813,57 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct
address_space *mapping,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +{
> + return _f2fs_write_data_pages(mapping, wbc, true);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function was copied from do_writepages from
mm/page-writeback.c.
> + * The major change is changing writepages to
_f2fs_write_data_pages.
> + */
> +static int f2fs_do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc, bool is_dir)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
> + return 0;
> + while (1) {
> + ret = _f2fs_write_data_pages(mapping, wbc, !is_dir);
> + if ((ret != -ENOMEM) || (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL))
> + break;
> + cond_resched();
> + congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function was copied from __filemap_fdatawrite_range from
> + * mm/filemap.c. The major change is changing do_writepages to
> + * f2fs_do_writepages.
> + */
> +int f2fs_filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping, bool
is_dir)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct writeback_control wbc = {
> + .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
> + .nr_to_write = LONG_MAX,
> + .range_start = 0,
> + .range_end = LLONG_MAX,
> + };
> +
> + if (!mapping_cap_writeback_dirty(mapping))
> + return 0;
> +
> + wbc_attach_fdatawrite_inode(&wbc, mapping->host);
> + ret = f2fs_do_writepages(mapping, &wbc, is_dir);
> + wbc_detach_inode(&wbc);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void f2fs_write_failed(struct address_space *mapping,
loff_t to)
> {
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 9280283..ea9bebb 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -2572,6 +2572,7 @@ void f2fs_invalidate_page(struct page
*page, unsigned int offset,
> int f2fs_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct
page *newpage,
> struct page *page, enum migrate_mode mode);
> #endif
> +int f2fs_filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping, bool
is_dir);
>
> /*
> * gc.c
> --
> 1.8.5.2
Thanks,
Yunlong Song
Thanks,
Yunlong Song
Thanks,
Yunlong Song