Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] mtd: cfi: reduce stack size with KASAN

[Boris Brezillon]

On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 11:09:53 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 23:15:40 +0200
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  
> >> When CONFIG_KASAN is used, we consume a lot of extra stack space:
> >>
> >> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c: In function 'do_write_buffer':
> >> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c:603:1: error: the frame size of 2184 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
> >> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c: In function 'cfi_staa_erase_varsize':
> >> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c:972:1: error: the frame size of 1936 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
> >> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c: In function 'do_write_buffer':
> >> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c:1841:1: error: the frame size of 1776 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
> >>
> >> This marks some functions as noinline_if_stackbloat to keep reduce the
> >> overall stack size.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c | 8 ++++----
> >>  include/linux/mtd/map.h             | 8 ++++----
> >>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c
> >> index 7d342965f392..5eee5e883f55 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c
> >> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static struct mtd_info *cfi_staa_setup(struct map_info *map)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>
> >> -static inline int do_read_onechip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, loff_t adr, size_t len, u_char *buf)
> >> +static noinline_if_stackbloat int do_read_onechip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, loff_t adr, size_t len, u_char *buf)  
> >
> > Why do we even need to mark those functions inline in the first place?
> > Isn't the compiler smart enough to decide when it should inline things?  
> 
> I'm pretty sure it doesn't need the 'inline' keywork. I see that the code was
> addedlike this in linux-2.4.0-test3pre3 along with the rest of the mtd layer,
> so it has always been 'inline' and nobody ever bothered to remove that
> during later cleanups.
> 
> We could probably just mark this function as 'noinline' here and never
> inline it,
> but I would rather not add more than one variant of noinline_if_stackbloat:
> almost all other users of noinline_if_stackbloat are for functions that have
> to be inline in normal builds, so it is defined as being either
> 'inline' or 'noinline'
> depending on whether KASAN is active.

Okay. Let's keep it like that then.