Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: mt6397: create irq mappings in mfd core driver

From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Mon Aug 07 2017 - 22:53:38 EST


On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:32:44PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 07/08/2017 at 09:57:41 +0800, Chen Zhong wrote:
> > The core driver should create and manage irq mappings instead of
> > leaf drivers. This patch change to pass irq domain to
> > devm_mfd_add_devices() and it will create mapping for irq resources
> > automatically. And remove irq mapping in rtc driver since this has
> > been done in core driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhong <chen.zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For the RTC part:
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > index 04a601f..6546d7f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6323_devs,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(mt6323_devs), NULL,
> > - 0, NULL);
> > + 0, pmic->irq_domain);
> > break;
> >
> > case MT6397_CID_CODE:
> > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6397_devs,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(mt6397_devs), NULL,
> > - 0, NULL);
> > + 0, pmic->irq_domain);
> > break;
> >
> > default:
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > index 1a61fa5..22c52f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > rtc->addr_base = res->start;
> >
> > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> > - rtc->irq = irq_create_mapping(mt6397_chip->irq_domain, res->start);
> > + rtc->irq = res->start;

Why not

rtc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (rtc->irq < 0)
return rtc->irq;
?

This way you propagate error properly.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry