çå: [PATCH v8 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc-k3: add sd support for hi3660
From: liwei (CM)
Date: Tue Aug 08 2017 - 23:05:31 EST
Hi, Ulf
Thank you very much for your advice.
1. Version history is really great information, however it doesn't belong inside the change log itsefl. Instead add "---" and a newline here, then put it all below that.
ãLiWeiãOKïI will fix it;
2. We have an API, mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(), that you probably should use here instead.
ãLiWeiãYes, you are right.I use mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() instead and test OK, I will modify it in patch v9;
3. Overall the code looks okay to me, however I am wondering about the relationship with the original k3 driver code and hi6220 code. Almost no code is being re-used between the different variants. Why is that?
ãLiWeiãSo far, it seems that dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios() and dw_mci_hi3660_switch_voltage() are not re-used, I think the main reason is that Hi3660 support uhs-sdr12/-uhs-sdr25/uhs-sdr50/uhs-sdr104, On the other hand,
we have custom register settings, such as:
#define AO_SCTRL_SEL18 BIT(10)
#define AO_SCTRL_CTRL3 0x40C
#define SOC_SCTRL_SCPERCTRL5 (0x314)
#define SDCARD_IO_SEL18 BIT(2)
So we can't merge relevant code.
Please help review patch v9, thank you!
-----éäåä-----
åää: Ulf Hansson [mailto:ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx]
åéæé: 2017å8æ8æ 19:04
æää: liwei (CM)
æé: Adrian Hunter; Jaehoon Chung; Shawn Lin; Wolfram Sang; Heiner Kallweit; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Guodong Xu
äé: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc-k3: add sd support for hi3660
On 2 August 2017 at 05:17, Li Wei <liwei213@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add sd card support for hi3660 soc
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei213@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun14@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Major changes in v3:
> - solve review comments from Heiner Kallweit.
> *use the GENMASK and FIELD_PREP macros replace the bit shift operation.
> *use usleep_range() replace udelay() and mdelay().
>
> Major changes in v4:
> - solve review comments from Jaehoon Chung.
> *move common register for dwmmc controller to dwmmc header file.
> *modify definitions type of some register variables.
> *get rid of the magic numbers.
>
> Major changes in v5:
> - further improve coding style.
>
> Major changes in v6:
> - solve review comments for Jaehoon Chung.
> *modify dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios() to static.
> *fix the comment style.
>
> Major changes in v7:
> - solve review comments for John Stultz.
> *remove reset code in dw_mmc-k3.c,use reset in core mmc.
>
> Major changes in v8:
> - modify patch v7 name and dependency order.
Version history is really great information, however it doesn't belong inside the change log itsefl. Instead add "---" and a newline here, then put it all below that.
[...]
> +static int dw_mci_hi3660_switch_voltage(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> + struct mmc_ios *ios) {
> + int ret;
> + int min_uv = 0;
> + int max_uv = 0;
> + struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> + struct k3_priv *priv;
> + struct dw_mci *host;
> +
> + host = slot->host;
> + priv = host->priv;
> +
> + if (!priv || !priv->reg)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (priv->ctrl_id == DWMMC_SDIO_ID)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330) {
> + ret = dw_mci_set_sel18(host, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + min_uv = 2950000;
> + max_uv = 2950000;
> + } else if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) {
> + ret = dw_mci_set_sel18(host, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + min_uv = 1800000;
> + max_uv = 1800000;
> + }
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mmc->supply.vqmmc))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = regulator_set_voltage(mmc->supply.vqmmc, min_uv,
> + max_uv);
We have an API, mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(), that you probably should use here instead.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(host->dev, "Regulator set error %d: %d - %d\n",
> + ret, min_uv, max_uv);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dw_mci_drv_data hi3660_data = {
> + .init = dw_mci_hi3660_init,
> + .set_ios = dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios,
> + .parse_dt = dw_mci_hi6220_parse_dt,
> + .execute_tuning = dw_mci_hi3660_execute_tuning,
> + .switch_voltage = dw_mci_hi3660_switch_voltage, };
> +
> static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_k3_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3660-dw-mshc", .data =
> + &hi3660_data, },
> { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc", .data = &k3_drv_data, },
> { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi6220-dw-mshc", .data = &hi6220_data, },
> {},
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> index 75da3756955d..5403758bf621 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> @@ -314,6 +314,8 @@ struct dw_mci_board {
> #define SDMMC_DSCADDR 0x094
> #define SDMMC_BUFADDR 0x098
> #define SDMMC_CDTHRCTL 0x100
> +#define SDMMC_UHS_REG_EXT 0x108
> +#define SDMMC_ENABLE_SHIFT 0x110
> #define SDMMC_DATA(x) (x)
> /*
> * Registers to support idmac 64-bit address mode
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Overall the code looks okay to me, however I am wondering about the relationship with the original k3 driver code and hi6220 code. Almost no code is being re-used between the different variants. Why is that?
Kind regards
Uffe