[PATCH 4.4 30/58] packet: fix use-after-free in prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Aug 09 2017 - 15:49:42 EST
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit c800aaf8d869f2b9b47b10c5c312fe19f0a94042 ]
There are multiple reports showing we have a use-after-free in
the timer prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired(), where we use struct
tpacket_kbdq_core::pkbdq, a pg_vec, after it gets freed by
free_pg_vec().
The interesting part is it is not freed via packet_release() but
via packet_setsockopt(), which means we are not closing the socket.
Looking into the big and fat function packet_set_ring(), this could
happen if we satisfy the following conditions:
1. closing == 0, not on packet_release() path
2. req->tp_block_nr == 0, we don't allocate a new pg_vec
3. rx_ring->pg_vec is already set as V3, which means we already called
packet_set_ring() wtih req->tp_block_nr > 0 previously
4. req->tp_frame_nr == 0, pass sanity check
5. po->mapped == 0, never called mmap()
In this scenario we are clearing the old rx_ring->pg_vec, so we need
to free this pg_vec, but we don't stop the timer on this path because
of closing==0.
The timer has to be stopped as long as we need to free pg_vec, therefore
the check on closing!=0 is wrong, we should check pg_vec!=NULL instead.
Thanks to liujian for testing different fixes.
Reported-by: alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: liujian (CE) <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: liujian (CE) <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -4225,7 +4225,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *
register_prot_hook(sk);
}
spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
- if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
+ if (pg_vec && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
/* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring */
if (!tx_ring)
prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po, rb_queue);