Hi.
2017-08-10 20:11 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
2017-08-10 19:37 GMT+09:00 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Katsuhiro,
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 16:27 +0900, Katsuhiro Suzuki wrote:
Add a reset line for analog signal amplifier core (ADAMV) on
UniPhier LD11/LD20 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <suzuki.katsuhiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>---
drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
index f60c137c17cb..cda4a78a58e2 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_pro4_peri_reset_data[] = {
UNIPHIER_RESET_END,};
+/* Analog signal amplifiers reset data */
+static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_ld11_adamv_reset_data[] = {
+ UNIPHIER_RESETX(100, 0x10, 6), /* EVEA */+};
+ UNIPHIER_RESET_END,
I take back my Acked-by.
The reset line index is independent from others
because this block is a separate instance.
Are you OK with starting from the reset ID 100?