Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl: move header file out of I2C realm

[Wolfram Sang]

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:03:52AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2017, Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:02:10AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > include/linux/i2c is not for client devices. Move the header file to a
> > > more appropriate location.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h            | 2 +-
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c          | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c             | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/iio/adc/twl4030-madc.c          | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.c         | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/input/keyboard/twl4030_keypad.c | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c  | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c      | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c                  | 6 +++---
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-audio.c             | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c               | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c             | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c               | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c           | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c  | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c               | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c                   | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c       | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c   | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c                   | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c       | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/video/backlight/pandora_bl.c    | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/watchdog/twl4030_wdt.c          | 2 +-
> > >  include/linux/{i2c => mfd}/twl.h        | 0
> > >  sound/soc/codecs/twl4030.c              | 2 +-
> > >  25 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > >  rename include/linux/{i2c => mfd}/twl.h (100%)
> > 
> > I didn't see this get applied yet, so just in case anyone was waiting
> > for me (this is trivial, so I don't think there's a need):
> 
> You're not the last. :)

Given the triviality of the change for non-MFD subsystems, can we apply
this for 4.14?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature