Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite

[Byungchul Park]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 03:05:22PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > I like Boqun's approach most but, _whatever_. It's ok if it solves the problem.
> > The last one is not bad when it is used for syscall exit, but we have to give
> > up valid dependencies unnecessarily in other cases. And I think Peterz's
> > approach should be modified a bit to make it work neatly, like:
> > 
> > crossrelease_hist_end(...)
> > {
> > ...
> >        invalidate_xhlock(&xhlock(cur->xhlock_idx_max));
> > 
> >        for (c = 0; c < XHLOCK_CXT_NR; c++)
> >               if ((cur->xhlock_idx_max - cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c]) >=
> > MAX_XHLOCKS_NR)
> >                      invalidate_xhlock(&xhlock(cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c]));
> > ...
> > }
> > 
> 
> Haven't looked into this deeply, but my gut feeling is this is
> unnecessary, will have a deep look.

Of course, for now, it looks like we can rely on the check_same_context()
on the commit, without invalidating it. But I think the approach might be
dangerous in future. I think it would be better to do it explicitlly.

> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> > And then Peterz's approach can also work, I think.
> > 
> > ---
> > Thanks,
> > Byungchul