Re: [PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IRQ_WORK_FLAGS is defined simply to 3UL. This is confusing as it
> says nothing about its purpose. Define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS as a bitwise
> OR of IRQ_WORK_PENDING and IRQ_WORK_BUSY.
>
> While we're at it: use the BIT() macro for all flags.

> +#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING       BIT(0)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY          BIT(1)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS         (IRQ_WORK_PENDING | IRQ_WORK_BUSY)

I dunno which style is preferred, though I would go with simple
GENMASK() here, as all definitions right on left :-)

Parameters of GENMASK will show last-first entries and can be easily decoded.
Although there are only two for now.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko