Re: SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE and init again

[Oleg Nesterov]

Hi Jamie,

On 08/14, Jamie Iles wrote:
>
> > > Not sure, let me think a bit more... and this is not enough anyway.
> > > 
> > > perhaps we should start with this simple change, but the "real" fix
> > > needs a lot of cleanups, although I am not sure if we will ever do this.
> > 
> > Okay, sounds good.  I'm happy to spend more time looking at this if you 
> > have suggestions - in the context of namespaces and containers this 
> > seems more relevant than when it was just the system init that we were 
> > protecting.
> 
> Any objections to moving ahead with this patch?

Oh, sorry.

OK, lets do this simple change then try to improve this logic further.

I'm afraid you need to re-send your patch, sorry.

Oleg.