Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Alloc resources before registering DMA device
From: Vinod Koul
Date: Thu Aug 17 2017 - 02:35:05 EST
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:54PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> We should allocate DMA channel resources before registering the
> DMA device in sba_probe() because we can get DMA request soon
> after registering the DMA device. If DMA channel resources are
> not allocated before first DMA request then SBA-RAID driver will
> crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> index f6616da..f14ed0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> @@ -1478,13 +1478,13 @@ static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba)
> int i, j, ret = 0;
> struct sba_request *req = NULL;
>
> - sba->resp_base = dma_alloc_coherent(sba->dma_dev.dev,
> + sba->resp_base = dma_alloc_coherent(sba->mbox_dev,
how does this qualify as move before registering, you seem to be using
different device now
> sba->max_resp_pool_size,
> &sba->resp_dma_base, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!sba->resp_base)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - sba->cmds_base = dma_alloc_coherent(sba->dma_dev.dev,
> + sba->cmds_base = dma_alloc_coherent(sba->mbox_dev,
> sba->max_cmds_pool_size,
> &sba->cmds_dma_base, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!sba->cmds_base) {
> @@ -1534,11 +1534,11 @@ static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba)
> return 0;
>
> fail_free_cmds_pool:
> - dma_free_coherent(sba->dma_dev.dev,
> + dma_free_coherent(sba->mbox_dev,
> sba->max_cmds_pool_size,
> sba->cmds_base, sba->cmds_dma_base);
> fail_free_resp_pool:
> - dma_free_coherent(sba->dma_dev.dev,
> + dma_free_coherent(sba->mbox_dev,
> sba->max_resp_pool_size,
> sba->resp_base, sba->resp_dma_base);
> return ret;
> @@ -1547,9 +1547,9 @@ static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba)
> static void sba_freeup_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba)
> {
> dmaengine_terminate_all(&sba->dma_chan);
> - dma_free_coherent(sba->dma_dev.dev, sba->max_cmds_pool_size,
> + dma_free_coherent(sba->mbox_dev, sba->max_cmds_pool_size,
> sba->cmds_base, sba->cmds_dma_base);
> - dma_free_coherent(sba->dma_dev.dev, sba->max_resp_pool_size,
> + dma_free_coherent(sba->mbox_dev, sba->max_resp_pool_size,
> sba->resp_base, sba->resp_dma_base);
> sba->resp_base = NULL;
> sba->resp_dma_base = 0;
> @@ -1737,15 +1737,15 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> - /* Register DMA device with linux async framework */
> - ret = sba_async_register(sba);
> + /* Prealloc channel resource */
> + ret = sba_prealloc_channel_resources(sba);
> if (ret)
> goto fail_free_mchans;
>
> - /* Prealloc channel resource */
> - ret = sba_prealloc_channel_resources(sba);
> + /* Register DMA device with Linux async framework */
> + ret = sba_async_register(sba);
> if (ret)
> - goto fail_async_dev_unreg;
> + goto fail_free_resources;
>
> /* Print device info */
> dev_info(sba->dev, "%s using SBAv%d and %d mailbox channels",
> @@ -1754,8 +1754,8 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> return 0;
>
> -fail_async_dev_unreg:
> - dma_async_device_unregister(&sba->dma_dev);
> +fail_free_resources:
> + sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba);
> fail_free_mchans:
> for (i = 0; i < sba->mchans_count; i++)
> mbox_free_channel(sba->mchans[i]);
> @@ -1767,10 +1767,10 @@ static int sba_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int i;
> struct sba_device *sba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> - sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba);
> -
> dma_async_device_unregister(&sba->dma_dev);
>
> + sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < sba->mchans_count; i++)
> mbox_free_channel(sba->mchans[i]);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
~Vinod