Re: [PATCH] selftests: timers: Fix run_destructive_tests target to handle skipped tests

[Benjamin Gaignard]

2017-08-19 2:36 GMT+02:00 John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When a test exits with skip exit code of 4, "make run_destructive_tests"
>> halts testing. Fix run_destructive_tests target to handle error exit codes.
>>
>> Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile
>> index c805ab048d26..6c1327278d5f 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile
>> @@ -13,20 +13,20 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = alarmtimer-suspend valid-adjtimex adjtick change_skew
>>
>>  include ../lib.mk
>>
>> +define RUN_DESTRUCTIVE_TESTS
>> +       @for TEST in $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED); do \
>> +               BASENAME_TEST=`basename $$TEST`;        \
>> +               if [ ! -x $$BASENAME_TEST ]; then       \
>> +                       echo "selftests: Warning: file $$BASENAME_TEST is not executable, correct this.";\
>> +                       echo "selftests: $$BASENAME_TEST [FAIL]"; \
>> +               else                                    \
>> +                       cd `dirname $$TEST`; (./$$BASENAME_TEST && echo "selftests: $$BASENAME_TEST [PASS]") || echo "selftests:  $$BASENAME_TEST [FAIL]"; cd -;\
>> +               fi;                                     \
>> +       done;
>> +endef
>
> One more on this...  you might remove rtctest_setdate from the
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED list, since it too requires arguments to test,
> and it wasn't a part of run_destructive_tests previously.
>
> I see Benjamin added this test not long ago, but I'm not sure exactly
> how he expects it to be run (just manually?).

Yes run this test manually is enough

>
> thanks
> -john



-- 
Benjamin Gaignard

Graphic Study Group

Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog