Re: [PATCH] fix memory leak on kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce

[David Hildenbrand]

On 22.08.2017 16:28, nixiaoming wrote:
> miss kfree(stt) when anon_inode_getfd return fail
> so add check anon_inode_getfd return val, and kfree stt
> 
> Signed-off-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
> index a160c14..a0b4459 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
> @@ -341,8 +341,11 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm,
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>  
> -	return anon_inode_getfd("kvm-spapr-tce", &kvm_spapr_tce_fops,
> +	ret = anon_inode_getfd("kvm-spapr-tce", &kvm_spapr_tce_fops,
>  				stt, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto fail;
> +	return ret;
>  
>  fail:
>  	if (stt) {
> 


stt has already been added to kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables, so freeing it
is evil IMHO. I don't know that code, so I don't know if there is some
other place that will make sure that everything in
kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables will properly get freed, even when no release
function has been called (kvm_spapr_tce_release).
-- 

Thanks,

David