Re: [PATCH net-next 02/13] phy: add the mvebu cp110 comphy driver
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Thu Aug 24 2017 - 10:02:49 EST
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:51 PM
> > To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kishon@xxxxxx; jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx; gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nadav Haklai <nadavh@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > Stefan Chulski <stefanc@xxxxxxxxxxx>; miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/13] phy: add the mvebu cp110 comphy driver
> >
> > Hi Antione.
> >
> > > How would you name it if not "comphy-cp110"?
> >
> > Good question...
> >
> > '7000-cpmphy-cp110'
> > '8000-cpmphy-cp110'
> >
> > ??
> >
> > Andrew
>
> A8K Marvell SoC has two South Bridge communication controllers
> and A7K only one communication controllers, but its identical
> communication controllers 110. Next generation will has another number 1xx.
Save this email, so we know who to blame when Marvell does something
different :-)
Andrew