Re: kvm splat in mmu_spte_clear_track_bits

From: Adam Borowski
Date: Sun Aug 27 2017 - 08:35:20 EST


On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 03:40:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/08/2017 15:14, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >>> I would also try commit 1372324b328cd5dabaef5e345e37ad48c63df2a9 to
> >>> identify whether it was caused by a KVM change in 4.13 or something
> >>> else.
> > I've ran different guests for a couple of hours, no explosions. Thus it
> > looks like updating Cornelia's email address isn't the cause.
> >
> > Too bad, there's 15k commits between 1372324b and 7f680d7ec315.
>
> So:
>
> - 4.12 works
>
> - 1372324b328cd5dabaef5e345e37ad48c63df2a9 works
>
> - 4.13-rc6 fails
>
> The next ones to test are going to be
> c136b84393d4e340e1b53fc7f737dd5827b19ee5 and 4.13-rc1.

c136b84393d4e340e1b53fc7f737dd5827b19ee5 works

4.13-rc1 works
Which actually isn't so surprising, as I pull from linus/master every Sunday
night/Monday morning, so I'd would have noticed KVM breakage sooner.

4.13-rc4 works

4.13-rc5 works (but â)

v4.13-rc5-173-g58d4e450a490 works... uh oh.
It shouldn't -- it's merge-base between mainline and what I was running on
the initial crash, and I'm sure anything non-mainline I had isn't the
culprit. After a couple of hours of running various loads inside and
outside KVM, I finally got it to crash.

4.13-rc5 retested fails
Crashed only after two hours or so of testing.

4.13-rc4 apparently works
It survived several hours of varied tests (like 5 debian-installer runs, a
win10 point release upgrade, some hurd package building, openbsd, etc),
all while the host was likewise busy.


Thus: to the best of my knowledge, the problem is between 4.13-rc4 and 4.13-rc5
but I wouldn't bet my life on it.


Meow!
--
âââââââ
âââââââ Vat kind uf sufficiently advanced technology iz dis!?
âââââââ -- Genghis Ht'rok'din
âââââââ