Il 27 ago 2017 9:49 AM, "Gerhard Wiesinger" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> haThnx. Why will 4.13.0 NOT have the fix?
scritto:
On 17.08.2017 23:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 17.08.2017 22:58, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:Hello Paolo,
On 07.08.2017 19:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:Hello Paolo,
Not much to say, unfortunately. It's pretty much the same capabilities
as a Prescott/Cedar Mill processor, except that it has MSR bitmaps. It
also lacks FlexPriority compared to the Conroe I had checked.
It's not great that even the revert patch doesn't apply cleanly---this
is *not* necessarily a boring area of the hypervisor...
Given the rarity of your machine I'm currently leaning towards _not_
reverting the change. I'll check another non-Xeon Core 2 tomorrow that
is from December 2008 (IIRC). If that one also lacks vNMI, or if I get
other reports, I suppose I will have to reconsider that.
Can you please revert the patch.
CPU is a Core 2 Extreme QX6700: SL9UL (B3) running VERY stable with ECC
RAM for years now.
https://ark.intel.com/products/28028/Intel-Core2-Extreme-
Processor-QX6700-8M-Cache-2_66-GHz-1066-MHz-FSB?q=Core%
202%20Extreme%20QX6700
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors
CPU details below.
Thank you.
Ciao,
Gerhard
Any update on this major issue?
We will revert the patch, but 4.13.0 will not have the fix. Expect it in
later stable kernels (because vacations).