Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sched/clock: interface to allow timestamps early in boot

[Pasha Tatashin]

> > > And because its called only once, it does not need to be marked __init()
> > > and must be kept around forever, right?
> >
> > This is because every other architecture implements read_boot_clock64()
> > without __init: arm, s390. Beside, the original weak stub does not have __init
> > macro. So, I can certainly try to add it for x86, but I am not sure what is
> > the behavior once __init section is gone, but weak implementation stays.
>
> And what about fixing that everywhere?

Sure, I will update it everywhere.