[PATCH V2 5/5] perf test: add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR
From: kan . liang
Date: Tue Aug 29 2017 - 13:13:13 EST
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
Extend sample-parsing test cases to support new sample type
PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index 6d028f4..c385848 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
}
}
+ if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
+ COMP(phys_addr);
+
return true;
}
@@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
.mask = sample_regs,
.regs = regs,
},
+ .phys_addr = 113,
};
struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},};
struct perf_sample sample_out;
@@ -305,7 +309,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
* were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change
* the condition below.
*/
- if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR << 1) {
+ if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) {
pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
return -1;
}
--
2.4.3