Re: [PATCH] irqchip: irq-bcm7120-l2: Use correct I/O accessors for irq_fwd_mask

[Marc Zyngier]

On 29/08/17 19:43, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Initialization of irq_fwd_mask was done using __raw_readl() which
> happens to work for all cases except when using ARM BE8 which requires
> readl() (with the proper swapping). Move the initialization of the

s/readl/writel/, I presume?

> irq_fwd_mask till later when we have correctly defined our I/O
> accessors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
> index 64c2692070ef..983640eba418 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
> @@ -250,12 +250,6 @@ static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(struct device_node *dn,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto out_free_l1_data;
>  
> -	for (idx = 0; idx < data->n_words; idx++) {
> -		__raw_writel(data->irq_fwd_mask[idx],
> -			     data->pair_base[idx] +
> -			     data->en_offset[idx]);
> -	}
> -
>  	for (irq = 0; irq < data->num_parent_irqs; irq++) {
>  		ret = bcm7120_l2_intc_init_one(dn, data, irq, valid_mask);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -297,6 +291,10 @@ static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(struct device_node *dn,
>  		gc->reg_base = data->pair_base[idx];
>  		ct->regs.mask = data->en_offset[idx];
>  
> +		/* gc->reg_base is defined and so is gc->writel */
> +		irq_reg_writel(gc, data->irq_fwd_mask[idx],
> +			       data->en_offset[idx]);
> +
>  		ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
>  		ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>  		ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_noop;
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...