Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Hyper-V: paravirtualized remote TLB flushing and hypercall improvements

[Ingo Molnar]

* Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > * Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> > Changes since v9:
> >> > - Rebase to 4.13-rc3.
> >> > - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no
> >> >   functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a different tree
> >> >   (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right).
> >> > - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg KH]
> >> > - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in
> >> >   hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko]
> >> > - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2
> >> >   reported by kbuild test robot (#include <asm/io.h>)
> >> > - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9.
> >> 
> >> Ingo,
> >> 
> >> this series ended up being 'almost merged' - you merged all but the last
> >> two patches to 'x86/platform' branch when Peter reported an issue with
> >> pagetable walkers. Now as we have 'x86/mm: Enable RCU based page table
> >> freeing (CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y)' merged to 'x86/mm' this is
> >> resolved and we can hopefully proceed with this series. Could you please
> >> let me know if I need to resend these last two patches or if you can
> >> take them from v10?
> >
> > Ok, I have merged tip:x86/mm into tip:x86/platform to pick up the dependency and 
> > have applied patches #9 and #10.
> 
> Hope you meant '#8 and #9' as v10 had only 9 patches :-)

Yes ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo