[PATCH 02/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove useless 'buf' parameter in the HW/SW cycle
From: Bin Meng
Date: Fri Sep 01 2017 - 03:57:49 EST
intel_spi_hw_cycle() and intel_spi_sw_cycle() don't use the parameter
'buf' at all. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
index e5b52e8..07626ca 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
@@ -377,8 +377,7 @@ static int intel_spi_opcode_index(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode)
return -EINVAL;
}
-static int intel_spi_hw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, u8 *buf,
- int len)
+static int intel_spi_hw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, int len)
{
u32 val, status;
int ret;
@@ -418,8 +417,7 @@ static int intel_spi_hw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, u8 *buf,
return 0;
}
-static int intel_spi_sw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, u8 *buf,
- int len)
+static int intel_spi_sw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, int len)
{
u32 val, status;
int ret;
@@ -456,9 +454,9 @@ static int intel_spi_read_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len)
writel(0, ispi->base + FADDR);
if (ispi->swseq)
- ret = intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
+ ret = intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
else
- ret = intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
+ ret = intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -486,8 +484,8 @@ static int intel_spi_write_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len)
return ret;
if (ispi->swseq)
- return intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
- return intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
+ return intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
+ return intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
}
static ssize_t intel_spi_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
--
2.9.2