RE: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: nvmem: add description for UniPhier eFuse

From: Keiji Hayashibara
Date: Tue Sep 05 2017 - 03:04:44 EST


Hello Yamada-san,

Thank you for your comment.

> From: Masahiro Yamada [mailto:yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 9:56 PM
>
> 2017-09-01 8:20 GMT+09:00 Keiji Hayashibara
> <hayashibara.keiji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Add uniphier-efuse dt-bindings documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt | 45
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..09024a2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > += UniPhier eFuse device tree bindings =
> > +
> > +This UniPhier eFuse must be under soc-glue.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: should be "socionext,uniphier-efuse"
> > +- reg: should contain the register base and length
> > +
> > += Data cells =
> > +Are child nodes of efuse, bindings of which as described in
> > +bindings/nvmem/nvmem.txt
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + soc-glue@5f900000 {
> > + compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld20-soc-glue-debug",
> > + "simple-mfd";
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges = <0x0 0x5f900000 0x2000>;
>
>
> IMHO, I think an empty "ranges;" will clarify the code, but it is up to
> your taste.
>
>
> > +
> > + efuse {
> > + compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse",
> > + "syscon";
>
>
> You are adding a dedicated driver for "socionext,uniphier-efuse".
>
> Then, "syscon" as well?
>

Since I was using the syscon interface to implement the driver,
I specified "syscon". It's interface is syscon_node_to_regmap().

I will rethink this in v2.

>
>
> > + reg = <0x100 0xf00>;
>
>
> Not so many efuse registers exist on the SoC.
>
> reg = <0x100 0x200>; will be enough.
>
>
> Or if you want to be strict to the hw spec, you can write as follows:
>
> soc-glue@5f900000 {
> compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld20-soc-glue-debug";
> "simple-mfd";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> ranges = <0x0 0x5f900000 0x2000>;
>
> efuse@100 {
> compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse";
> reg = <0x100 0x28>;
> };
>
> efuse@200 {
> compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse";
> reg = <0x200 0x68>;
> };
> };
>
>
>
>
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + /* Data cells */
> > + usb_mon: usb_mon {
> > + reg = <0x154 0xc>;
> > + };
>
>
> This <0x154 0xc> represents 0x5f900254 in CPU address view.
> (0x5f900000 + 0x100 + 0x154)
>
> So many ranges conversion, and how error-prone..
>

Yes, indeed...
I will modify as below.

soc-glue@5f900000 {
compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld20-soc-glue-debug",
"simple-mfd";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges;

efuse@5f900100 {
compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse";
reg = <0x5f900100 0x28>;
};

efuse@5f900200 {
compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse";
reg = <0x5f900200 0x68>;
};
};


>
>
>
> > + };
> > +
> > += Data consumers =
> > +Are device nodes which consume nvmem data cells.
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + usb {
> > + ...
> > + nvmem-cells = <&usb_mon>;
> > + nvmem-cell-names = "usb_mon";
> > + }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
> > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada

Best Regards,
Keiji Hayashibara