Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] [media] cxd2880: Add tuner part of the driver

From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Date: Thu Sep 07 2017 - 06:26:43 EST


Em Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:12:57 +0900
"Takiguchi, Yasunari" <Yasunari.Takiguchi@xxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> Dear Mauro
>
> Thanks for your review and reply.
>
> We are going to discuss how to change our code with your comments internally.
>
> I reply for your 2 comments,
>
> >> [Change list]
> >> Changes in V3
> >> drivers/media/dvb-frontends/cxd2880/cxd2880_dtv.h
> >> -removed code relevant to ISDB-T
> >
> > Just curiosity here: why is it removed?
> We decided to withhold the ISDB-T functionality as it contains some company proprietary code.

I'm sorry to hear. I hope that such code could be released
on some future.

> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> + if ((sys == CXD2880_DTV_SYS_DVBT2) && en_fef_intmtnt_ctrl) {
> >> + data[0] = 0x01;
> >> + data[1] = 0x01;
> >> + data[2] = 0x01;
> >> + data[3] = 0x01;
> >> + data[4] = 0x01;
> >> + data[5] = 0x01;
> >> + } else {
> >> + data[0] = 0x00;
> >> + data[1] = 0x00;
> >> + data[2] = 0x00;
> >> + data[3] = 0x00;
> >> + data[4] = 0x00;
> >> + data[5] = 0x00;
> >> + }
> >
> > Instead, just do:
> >
> > if ((sys == CXD2880_DTV_SYS_DVBT2) && en_fef_intmtnt_ctrl)
> > memset(data, 0x01, sizeof(data));
> > else
> > memset(data, 0x00, sizeof(data));
> >
> >> + ret = tnr_dmd->io->write_regs(tnr_dmd->io,
> >> + CXD2880_IO_TGT_SYS,
> >> + 0xef, data, 6);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = tnr_dmd->io->write_reg(tnr_dmd->io,
> >> + CXD2880_IO_TGT_DMD,
> >> + 0x00, 0x2d);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >
> >> + if ((sys == CXD2880_DTV_SYS_DVBT2) && en_fef_intmtnt_ctrl)
> >> + data[0] = 0x00;
> >> + else
> >> + data[0] = 0x01;
> >
> > Not actually needed, as the previous logic already set data[0]
> > accordingly.
> >
> >> + ret = tnr_dmd->io->write_reg(tnr_dmd->io,
> >> + CXD2880_IO_TGT_DMD,
> >> + 0xb1, data[0]);
>
> In this caseãlogic of data[0]( logic of if() ) is different from that of previous one.
> And with setting register for address 0xb1, a bug might occur in the future,
> if our software specification (sequence) is changed.
> So we would like to keep setting value of data[0] for address 0xb1.

OK. Better to document it then, as otherwise someone might
end by sending cleanup patches that would touch it.

>
> Thanks,
> Takiguchi



Thanks,
Mauro