Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix wrong %pF and %pS printk format specifier usages

[Petr Mladek]

On Wed 2017-09-06 22:27:47, Helge Deller wrote:
> This patch series fixes the wrong usages of the %pF and %pS printk format
> specifiers throughout the kernel code.
> 
> Both specifiers have the same result on most architectures. But on ia64, ppc64
> and parisc64 architectures the %pF specifier does an extra conversion because
> there function pointers are actually function descriptors.
> 
> Helge
> 
> Helge Deller (14):
>   arm: Use %pS printk format for symbols from direct addresses
>   um: Use %pS printk format for symbols from direct addresses

IMHO, we should use %pB in this patch. 

>   x86: Use %pS printk format for symbols from direct addresses
>   ti_sci: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   i915: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   md/bcache: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   power/avs: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   fs/f2fs: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   fs/pstore: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   fs/xfs: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   smp: Use %pF printk format specifier for function pointers
>   mm/memblock: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   netfilter/ipvs: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
>   sound/core: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses

All other patches look fine. For the entire patchset, except
for the "um: " patch, feel free to use:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>

Let me known if this is enough or if I should answer each patch
individually.

Best Regards,
Petr