Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] [media] exynos-gsc: Add hardware rotation limits

[Hoegeun Kwon]

Hi Sylwester,

On 09/11/2017 06:35 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 08:02 AM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> > The hardware rotation limits of gsc depends on SOC (Exynos
> > 5250/5420/5433). Distinguish them and add them to the driver data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c | 96 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >   1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c 
> > b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
> > index 4380150..8f8636e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
> > @@ -943,7 +943,37 @@ static irqreturn_t gsc_irq_handler(int irq, void 
> > *priv)
> >       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >   }
> >   -static struct gsc_pix_max gsc_v_100_max = {
> > +static struct gsc_pix_max gsc_v_5250_max = {
> > +    .org_scaler_bypass_w    = 8192,
> > +    .org_scaler_bypass_h    = 8192,
> > +    .org_scaler_input_w    = 4800,
> > +    .org_scaler_input_h    = 3344,
> > +    .real_rot_dis_w        = 4800,
> > +    .real_rot_dis_h        = 3344,
> > +    .real_rot_en_w        = 2016,
> > +    .real_rot_en_h        = 2016,
> > +    .target_rot_dis_w    = 4800,
> > +    .target_rot_dis_h    = 3344,
> > +    .target_rot_en_w    = 2016,
> > +    .target_rot_en_h    = 2016,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct gsc_pix_max gsc_v_5420_max = {
> > +    .org_scaler_bypass_w    = 8192,
> > +    .org_scaler_bypass_h    = 8192,
> > +    .org_scaler_input_w    = 4800,
> > +    .org_scaler_input_h    = 3344,
> > +    .real_rot_dis_w        = 4800,
> > +    .real_rot_dis_h        = 3344,
> > +    .real_rot_en_w        = 2048,
> > +    .real_rot_en_h        = 2048,
> > +    .target_rot_dis_w    = 4800,
> > +    .target_rot_dis_h    = 3344,
> > +    .target_rot_en_w    = 2016,
> > +    .target_rot_en_h    = 2016,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct gsc_pix_max gsc_v_5433_max = {
> >       .org_scaler_bypass_w    = 8192,
> >       .org_scaler_bypass_h    = 8192,
> >       .org_scaler_input_w    = 4800,
> > @@ -979,8 +1009,8 @@ static irqreturn_t gsc_irq_handler(int irq, void 
> > *priv)
> >       .target_h        = 2,  /* yuv420 : 2, others : 1 */
> >   };
> >   -static struct gsc_variant gsc_v_100_variant = {
> > -    .pix_max        = &gsc_v_100_max,
> > +static struct gsc_variant gsc_v_5250_variant = {
> > +    .pix_max        = &gsc_v_5250_max,
> >       .pix_min        = &gsc_v_100_min,
> >       .pix_align        = &gsc_v_100_align,
> >       .in_buf_cnt        = 32,
> > @@ -992,12 +1022,48 @@ static irqreturn_t gsc_irq_handler(int irq, 
> > void *priv)
> >       .local_sc_down        = 2,
> >   };
> >   -static struct gsc_driverdata gsc_v_100_drvdata = {
> > +static struct gsc_variant gsc_v_5420_variant = {
> > +    .pix_max        = &gsc_v_5420_max,
> > +    .pix_min        = &gsc_v_100_min,
> > +    .pix_align        = &gsc_v_100_align,
> > +    .in_buf_cnt        = 32,
> > +    .out_buf_cnt        = 32,
> > +    .sc_up_max        = 8,
> > +    .sc_down_max        = 16,
> > +    .poly_sc_down_max    = 4,
> > +    .pre_sc_down_max    = 4,
> > +    .local_sc_down        = 2,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct gsc_variant gsc_v_5433_variant = {
> > +    .pix_max        = &gsc_v_5433_max,
> > +    .pix_min        = &gsc_v_100_min,
> > +    .pix_align        = &gsc_v_100_align,
> > +    .in_buf_cnt        = 32,
> > +    .out_buf_cnt        = 32,
> > +    .sc_up_max        = 8,
> > +    .sc_down_max        = 16,
> > +    .poly_sc_down_max    = 4,
> > +    .pre_sc_down_max    = 4,
> > +    .local_sc_down        = 2,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct gsc_driverdata gsc_v_5250_drvdata = {
> >       .variant = {
> > -        [0] = &gsc_v_100_variant,
> > -        [1] = &gsc_v_100_variant,
> > -        [2] = &gsc_v_100_variant,
> > -        [3] = &gsc_v_100_variant,
> > +        [0] = &gsc_v_5250_variant,
> > +        [1] = &gsc_v_5250_variant,
> > +        [2] = &gsc_v_5250_variant,
> > +        [3] = &gsc_v_5250_variant,
> > +    },
> > +    .num_entities = 4,
> > +    .clk_names = { "gscl" },
> > +    .num_clocks = 1,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct gsc_driverdata gsc_v_5420_drvdata = {
> > +    .variant = {
> > +        [0] = &gsc_v_5420_variant,
> > +        [1] = &gsc_v_5420_variant,
> >       },
> >       .num_entities = 4,
> >       .clk_names = { "gscl" },
> > @@ -1006,9 +1072,9 @@ static irqreturn_t gsc_irq_handler(int irq, 
> > void *priv)
> >     static struct gsc_driverdata gsc_5433_drvdata = {
> >       .variant = {
> > -        [0] = &gsc_v_100_variant,
> > -        [1] = &gsc_v_100_variant,
> > -        [2] = &gsc_v_100_variant,
> > +        [0] = &gsc_v_5433_variant,
> > +        [1] = &gsc_v_5433_variant,
> > +        [2] = &gsc_v_5433_variant,
> >       },
> >       .num_entities = 3,
> >       .clk_names = { "pclk", "aclk", "aclk_xiu", "aclk_gsclbend" },
> > @@ -1017,8 +1083,12 @@ static irqreturn_t gsc_irq_handler(int irq, 
> > void *priv)
> >     static const struct of_device_id exynos_gsc_match[] = {
> >       {
> > -        .compatible = "samsung,exynos5-gsc",
> > -        .data = &gsc_v_100_drvdata,
>
> Can you keep the "samsung,exynos5-gsc" entry with the gsc_v_5250_variant
> data, so that it can work with "samsung,exynos5-gsc" compatible in DT
> on both exynos5250 and exynos5420 SoCs?

Thank you for your question.

Exynos 5250 and 5420 have different hardware rotation limits.
Exynos 5250 is '.real_rot_en_w/h = 2016' and 5420 is '.real_rot_en_w/h = 
2048'.

So my opinion they must have different compatible.

Best regards,
Hoegeun

> > +        .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-gsc",
> > +        .data = &gsc_v_5250_drvdata,
> > +    },
> > +    {
> > +        .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-gsc",
> > +        .data = &gsc_v_5420_drvdata,
> >       },