Re: [RFC Part2 PATCH v3 23/26] KVM: X86: Add memory encryption enabled ops
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Thu Sep 14 2017 - 10:10:06 EST
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:03:00PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Extend kvm_x86_ops to add memory_encyption_enabled() ops.
> It returns a
> boolean indicating whether memory encryption is enabled on the VCPU.
You don't need that sentence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a91aadf..a14d4dd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
> struct kvm_memory_encrypt_ram *ram);
> int (*memory_encryption_unregister_ram)(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_memory_encrypt_ram *ram);
> + bool (*memory_encryption_enabled)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> };
>
> struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index cdb1cf3..0bbd050 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -6548,6 +6548,12 @@ static int mem_encrypt_unregister_ram(struct kvm *kvm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool mem_encrypt_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return !!(to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->control.nested_ctl &
> + SVM_NESTED_CTL_SEV_ENABLE);
You don't need the !!
> +}
> +
> static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
> .cpu_has_kvm_support = has_svm,
> .disabled_by_bios = is_disabled,
> @@ -6664,6 +6670,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
> .memory_encryption_op = svm_memory_encryption_op,
> .memory_encryption_register_ram = mem_encrypt_register_ram,
> .memory_encryption_unregister_ram = mem_encrypt_unregister_ram,
> + .memory_encryption_enabled = mem_encrypt_enabled,
> +
mem_enc_enabled looks better to me.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix ImendÃrffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG NÃrnberg)
--