[PATCH 4.9 03/78] ipv6: fix sparse warning on rt6i_node

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Wei Wang <weiwan@xxxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit 4e587ea71bf924f7dac621f1351653bd41e446cb ]

Commit c5cff8561d2d adds rcu grace period before freeing fib6_node. This
generates a new sparse warning on rt->rt6i_node related code:
  net/ipv6/route.c:1394:30: error: incompatible types in comparison
  expression (different address spaces)
  ./include/net/ip6_fib.h:187:14: error: incompatible types in comparison
  expression (different address spaces)

This commit adds "__rcu" tag for rt6i_node and makes sure corresponding
rcu API is used for it.
After this fix, sparse no longer generates the above warning.

Fixes: c5cff8561d2d ("ipv6: add rcu grace period before freeing fib6_node")
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/ip6_fib.h |    2 +-
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c   |    2 +-
 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c    |   11 +++++++----
 net/ipv6/route.c      |    3 ++-
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct rt6_info {
 	 * the same cache line.
 	 */
 	struct fib6_table		*rt6i_table;
-	struct fib6_node		*rt6i_node;
+	struct fib6_node __rcu		*rt6i_node;
 
 	struct in6_addr			rt6i_gateway;
 
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -5443,7 +5443,7 @@ static void __ipv6_ifa_notify(int event,
 		 * our DAD process, so we don't need
 		 * to do it again
 		 */
-		if (!(ifp->rt->rt6i_node))
+		if (!rcu_access_pointer(ifp->rt->rt6i_node))
 			ip6_ins_rt(ifp->rt);
 		if (ifp->idev->cnf.forwarding)
 			addrconf_join_anycast(ifp);
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ add:
 
 		rt->dst.rt6_next = iter;
 		*ins = rt;
-		rt->rt6i_node = fn;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(rt->rt6i_node, fn);
 		atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
 		inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info, nlflags);
 		info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_rt_entries++;
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ add:
 			return err;
 
 		*ins = rt;
-		rt->rt6i_node = fn;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(rt->rt6i_node, fn);
 		rt->dst.rt6_next = iter->dst.rt6_next;
 		atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
 		inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info, NLM_F_REPLACE);
@@ -1459,8 +1459,9 @@ static void fib6_del_route(struct fib6_n
 
 int fib6_del(struct rt6_info *rt, struct nl_info *info)
 {
+	struct fib6_node *fn = rcu_dereference_protected(rt->rt6i_node,
+				    lockdep_is_held(&rt->rt6i_table->tb6_lock));
 	struct net *net = info->nl_net;
-	struct fib6_node *fn = rt->rt6i_node;
 	struct rt6_info **rtp;
 
 #if RT6_DEBUG >= 2
@@ -1649,7 +1650,9 @@ static int fib6_clean_node(struct fib6_w
 			if (res) {
 #if RT6_DEBUG >= 2
 				pr_debug("%s: del failed: rt=%p@%p err=%d\n",
-					 __func__, rt, rt->rt6i_node, res);
+					 __func__, rt,
+					 rcu_access_pointer(rt->rt6i_node),
+					 res);
 #endif
 				continue;
 			}
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1361,7 +1361,8 @@ static void rt6_do_update_pmtu(struct rt
 static bool rt6_cache_allowed_for_pmtu(const struct rt6_info *rt)
 {
 	return !(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_CACHE) &&
-		(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_PCPU || rt->rt6i_node);
+		(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_PCPU ||
+		 rcu_access_pointer(rt->rt6i_node));
 }
 
 static void __ip6_rt_update_pmtu(struct dst_entry *dst, const struct sock *sk,