Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm-smmu: performance optimization

[Leizhen (ThunderTown)]

On 2017/9/19 12:31, Nate Watterson wrote:
> Hi Leizhen,
> 
> On 9/12/2017 9:00 AM, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> v1 -> v2:
>> base on (add02cfdc9bc2 "iommu: Introduce Interface for IOMMU TLB Flushing")
>>
>> Zhen Lei (3):
>>    iommu/arm-smmu-v3: put off the execution of TLBI* to reduce lock
>>      confliction
>>    iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add support for unmap an iova range with only one
>>      tlb sync
> 
> I tested these (2) patches on QDF2400 hardware and saw performance
> improvements in line with those I reported when testing the original
> series. I don't have any hardware close at hand to test the 3rd patch
> in the series so that will have to come from someone else.
Thanks a lot.

> 
> Tested-by: Nate Watterson <nwatters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks,
> Nate
> 
>>    iommu/arm-smmu: add support for unmap a memory range with only one tlb
>>      sync
>>
>>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c        | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c           | 10 ++++++++
>>   drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c | 32 +++++++++++++++--------
>>   drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c     | 30 ++++++++++++++--------
>>   drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h         |  1 +
>>   5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
> 

-- 
Thanks!
BestRegards