Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Check for spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd() return value

From: Cyrille Pitchen
Date: Tue Sep 19 2017 - 13:33:25 EST


Hi Richard,

Le 17/09/2017 Ã 11:57, Richard Weinberger a ÃcritÂ:
> The function can return a negativ value in case of errors,
> don't use it blindly as array index.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan CID#1418067 ("Memory - illegal accesses")
> Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable
> Parameters (SFDP) tables")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index cf1d4a15e10a..d71765739a93 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -2145,6 +2145,9 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(struct spi_nor *nor,
>
> params->hwcaps.mask |= rd->hwcaps;
> cmd = spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd(rd->hwcaps);
> + if (cmd < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> read = &params->reads[cmd];
> half = bfpt.dwords[rd->settings_dword] >> rd->settings_shift;
> spi_nor_set_read_settings_from_bfpt(read, half, rd->proto);
>

This one is a false positive:

static const struct sfdp_bfpt_read sfdp_bfpt_reads[] = {
/* Fast Read 1-1-2 */
{
SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_2,
BFPT_DWORD(1), BIT(16), /* Supported bit */
BFPT_DWORD(4), 0, /* Settings */
SNOR_PROTO_1_1_2,
},
[...]
};

static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(...)
{
[...]
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sfdp_bfpt_reads); i++) {
const struct sfdp_bfpt_read *rd = &sfdp_bfpt_reads[i];
[...]
cmd = spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd(rd->hwcaps);
read = &params->reads[cmd];
[...]
}
[...]
}

sfdp_bfpt_reads[] is a static const array where each element has a valid
.hwcaps value so spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd() can actually never return an
out of range 'cmd' result here.


However in spi_nor_select_read(), spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd() is called
too but this time its input argument now comes from the spi_nor_scan()
caller so in this later case the code already checks the output of
spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd() as it could be -EINVAL.


Do you want us to take this patch anyway to please the code checker ?
I don't think it is mandatory as a fix for 4.14-rc2.

Best regards,

Cyrille