Re: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference

[Michael Ellerman]

Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On (09/19/17 20:22), Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > On 2017/09/16 12:53PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> >> We are moving towards separate kernel and module function descriptor
>> >> dereference callbacks. This patch enables it for powerpc64.
>> >> 
>> >> For pointers that belong to the kernel
>> >> -  Added __start_opd and __end_opd pointers, to track the kernel
>> >>    .opd section address range;
>> >> 
>> >> -  Added dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(). Now we
>> >>    will dereference only function pointers that are within
>> >>    [__start_opd, __end_opd];
>> >> 
>> >> For pointers that belong to a module
>> >> -  Added dereference_module_function_descriptor() to handle module
>> >>    function descriptor dereference. Now we will dereference only
>> >>    pointers that are within [module->opd.start, module->opd.end].
>> >
>> > Would it be simpler to just use kernel_text_address() and dereference 
>> > everything else? See commit 83e840c770f2c5 ("powerpc64/elfv1: Only 
>> > dereference function descriptor for non-text symbols") for a related 
>> > patch.
>> 
>> Yeah that would be a lot simpler and probably work perfectly well.
>
> unlike ppc_function_entry(), printk() can get called on any symbol,
> not just function pointers.
>
> for example,
>
> cat /proc/kallsyms | grep shrinker_rwsem
> ffffffff81a4b1e0 d shrinker_rwsem

Yep, good point. So your patch is probably good then. Maybe someone
other than me can find time to test it ;)

cheers