Re: [PATCH 1/6] buffer: cleanup free_more_memory() flusher wakeup

[Jan Kara]

On Tue 19-09-17 13:53:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This whole function is... interesting. Change the wakeup call
> to the flusher threads to pass in nr_pages == 0, instead of
> some random number of pages. This matches more closely what
> similar cases do for memory shortage/reclaim.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>

Ok, probably makes sense. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

BTW, after this nobody seems to use the number of pages for
wakeup_flusher_threads() so can you just delete the argument for the
function? After all system-wide wakeup is useful only for system wide
sync(2) or memory reclaim so number of pages isn't very useful...

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 170df856bdb9..9471a445e370 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void free_more_memory(void)
>  	struct zoneref *z;
>  	int nid;
>  
> -	wakeup_flusher_threads(1024, WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM);
> +	wakeup_flusher_threads(0, WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM);
>  	yield();
>  
>  	for_each_online_node(nid) {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR