Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

[Wolfram Sang]

Hi Mauro,

> > +Linux I2C and DMA
> > +-----------------
> 
> I would use, instead:
> 
> =================
> Linux I2C and DMA
> =================
> 
> As this is the way we're starting document titles, after converted to
> ReST. So, better to have it already using the right format, as one day

I did this.

> There are also a couple of things here that Sphinx would complain.

The only complaint I got was

	WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree

which makes sense because I renamed it only temporarily to *.rst

> So, it could be worth to rename it to *.rst, while you're writing
> it, and see what:
> 	make htmldocs
> will complain and how it will look in html.

So, no complaints from Sphinx and the HTML output looks good IMO. Was
there anything specific you had in mind when saying that Sphinx would
complain?

Regards,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature