Re: [PATCH 02/14] um: Use %pS printk format for symbols from direct addresses

[Richard Weinberger]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed 2017-09-06 22:27:49, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Use the %pS printk format for printing symbols from direct addresses.
>> In usermode-linux there is actually no difference between %pS and %pF, but for
>> consistency throughout the kernel fix the wrong usage here too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>>  arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
>> index 6b995e8..05585ee 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>>
>>  static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
>>  {
>> -     pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pF\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
>> +     pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
>>               (void *)address);
>
> This seems to be used to print addresses from the stack.
> IMHO, we should use %pB here.

%pWTF? ;)

Agreed, let's use %pB.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard