Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/fpu: reinitialize FPU registers if restoring FPU state fails
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Thu Sep 21 2017 - 16:41:41 EST
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 11:52 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Userspace can change the FPU state of a task using the ptrace() or
> rt_sigreturn() system calls.ÂÂBecause reserved bits in the FPU state
> can
> cause the XRSTOR instruction to fail, the kernel has to carefully
> validate that no reserved bits or other invalid values are being set.
>
> Unfortunately, there have been bugs in this validation code.ÂÂFor
> example, we were not checking that the 'xcomp_bv' field in the
> xstate_header was 0.ÂÂAs-is, such bugs are exploitable to read the
> FPU
> registers of other processes on the system.ÂÂTo do so, an attacker
> can
> create a task, assign to it an invalid FPU state, then spin in a loop
> and monitor the values of the FPU registers.ÂÂBecause the task's FPU
> registers are not being restored, sometimes the FPU registers will
> have
> the values from another process.
>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
All rights reversedAttachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part