Re: [PATCH 1/4] pid: Replace pid bitmap implementation with IDR API
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Mon Sep 25 2017 - 09:10:05 EST
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 08:56 -0400, Gargi Sharma wrote:
> This patch replaces the current bitmap implemetation for
> Process ID allocation. Functions that are no longer required,
> for example, free_pidmap(), alloc_pidmap(), etc. are removed.
> The rest of the functions are modified to use the IDR API.
> The change was made to make the PID allocation less complex by
> replacing custom code with calls to generic API.
Nice work, Gargi!
> Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@xxxxxxxxx>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
> @@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static int show_spu_loadavg(struct seq_file *s,
> void *private)
> Â LOAD_INT(c), LOAD_FRAC(c),
> Â count_active_contexts(),
> Â atomic_read(&nr_spu_contexts),
> - task_active_pid_ns(current)->last_pid);
> + task_active_pid_ns(current)->idr.idr_next-1);
> Â return 0;
> Â}
The repeated use of "idr.idr_next - 1" suggests that maybe this could
be hidden behind a new IDR API, but that could be something for a
follow-up patch.
There already is the idr_get_cursor function, but you would still
have to subtract 1 from the value returned by idr_get_cursor...
Other than that nitpick, this patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
kind regards,
Rik van Riel
--
All Rights Reversed.Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part