RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/10] net: hns3: Add mqprio support when interacting with network stack

[Yuval Mintz]

> When using tc qdisc to configure DCB parameter, dcb_ops->setup_tc
> is used to tell hclge_dcb module to do the setup.

While this might be a step in the right direction, this causes an inconsistency
in user experience - Some [well, most] vendors didn't allow the mqprio
priority mapping to affect DCB, instead relying on the dcbnl functionality
to control that configuration.

A couple of options to consider:
  - Perhaps said logic shouldn't be contained inside the driver but rather
     in mqprio logic itself. I.e., rely on DCBNL functionality [if available] from
     within mqprio and try changing the configuration. 
  - Add a new TC_MQPRIO_HW_OFFLOAD_ value to explicitly reflect user
     request to allow this configuration to affect DCB.

> When using lldptool to configure DCB parameter, hclge_dcb module
> call the client_ops->setup_tc to tell network stack which queue
> and priority is using for specific tc.

You're basically bypassing the mqprio logic.
Since you're configuring the prio->queue mapping from DCB flow,
you'll get an mqprio-like behavior [meaning a transmitted packet
would reach a transmission queue associated with its priority] even
if device wasn't grated with an mqprio qdisc.
Why should your user even use mqprio? What benefit does he get from it?

...

> +static int hns3_nic_set_real_num_queue(struct net_device *netdev)
> +{
> +	struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	struct hnae3_handle *h = priv->ae_handle;
> +	struct hnae3_knic_private_info *kinfo = &h->kinfo;
> +	unsigned int queue_size = kinfo->rss_size * kinfo->num_tc;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(netdev, queue_size);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		netdev_err(netdev,
> +			   "netif_set_real_num_tx_queues fail, ret=%d!\n",
> +			   ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(netdev, queue_size);

I don't think you're changing the driver behavior, but why are you setting
the real number of rx queues based on the number of TCs?
Do you actually open (TC x RSS) Rx queues?