Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: check match table

[Nick Desaulniers]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/09/2017 19:12, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Does this make any other checks redundant and removable?
> 
> It would make sense to place it in cpu_has_kvm_support instead

cpu_has_kvm_support() or cpu_has_vmx()?

>, and the same in svm.c's has_svm.

I don't follow (but I also don't know what any of these three letter
acryonyms acronyms stand for), does svm depend on vmx or vice-versa?