Re: [patch 3/3] x86: kvm guest side support for KVM_HC_RT_PRIO hypercall\
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Oct 02 2017 - 08:48:24 EST
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 02:30:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I don't understand why is it correct to delay interrupt injection just
> because VCPU0 is running in a spinlock-protected region? I just cannot
> see the reason why it's safe and not a recipe for priority inversions.
It is indeed not right. Something like:
/* do crud */
Should not hold off the interrupt that tells you your finger is in
imminent danger of becoming detached. Only when we do
local_irq_disable() (ie. raw_spin_lock_irq*() and the like) should we
avoid interrupt delivery.
This whole fixation on spinlock regions is misguided and must stop, its
wrong on all levels.