Re: [PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD, mm: Extend with mem_encrypt=sme option
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Oct 02 2017 - 09:52:20 EST
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 08:44:21AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> I think we're talking about the same thing. You want sev_enabled to
> indicate whether you can launch an SEV guest. We would still need an
> sev_active variable to distinguish between SME and SEV during kernel
> execution when the sme_me_mask is non-zero. Currently, the SEV feature
> bit acts as "sev_enabled" and the sev_enabled variable acts as
> "sev_active" in this scenario.
See my last email about sev_host_enabled. Does that sound better?
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix ImendÃrffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG NÃrnberg)