Re: [v8 0/4] cgroup-aware OOM killer

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Mon Oct 02 2017 - 10:30:00 EST

On Mon 02-10-17 13:47:12, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 02:24:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I believe the latest version (v9) looks sensible from the semantic point
> > of view and we should focus on making it into a mergeable shape.
> The only thing is that after some additional thinking I don't think anymore
> that implicit propagation of oom_group is a good idea.

It would be better to discuss this under the v9 thread. This one is
already quite convoluted IMHO.
Michal Hocko