Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: check match table
From: Nick Desaulniers
Date: Tue Oct 03 2017 - 22:58:36 EST
I think an extra `did not` made it in to that last email...sorry!
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Nick Desaulniers
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:42:18AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 01/10/2017 01:22, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> > I don't follow (but I also don't know what any of these three letter
>> > acryonyms acronyms stand for), does svm depend on vmx or vice-versa?
>> Neither, one is Intel (VMX), the other is AMD (SVM).
> Oh, neat, did not realize the vendors did not have different names for
> their virtualization extensions.
>> Would this work for you?
> It doesn't apply cleanly on Linus' tree, or the KVM tree master branch,
> so I couldn't fully test it. But it does look like it will do the
>> And again, is this only with clang?
> Indeed the warning was coming from Clang, but looks like some
> additional cleanup was done, which is good.
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@xxxxxxxxx>