Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/64] 4.9.53-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:29:46PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 7:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.53 release.
> > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Oct  5 11:42:06 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.53-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> 
> Test results from the linaro linux kernel functional test farm:
> 
> kernel: 4.9.53-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.9.y
> git commit: aceea42c68d96c58958954e4c8c23a26f8883d62
> git describe: v4.9.52-65-gaceea42c68d9
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.52-65-gaceea42c68d9
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.9.51-78-ge009129d09cb)
> 
> Boards, architectures and test suites:
> -------------------------------------
> 
> hi6220-hikey - arm64 
> * boot - 1 pass
> * kselftest - 38 pass - 1 skip - 15 known failures
> * libhugetlbfs - 90 pass - 1 skip
> * ltp-syscalls-tests - 964 pass - 136 skip
> 
> juno-r2 - arm64 
> * boot - 1 pass
> * kselftest - 37 pass - 1 skip - 14 known failures
> * libhugetlbfs - 90 pass - 1 skip
> 
> dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64 
> * boot - 1 pass
> * kselftest - 52 pass - 15 known failures
> * libhugetlbfs - 76 pass - 1 skip
> * ltp-syscalls-tests - 941 pass - 175 skip - 11known failures

Looks like you lost a ' ' in that last line somehow :)

Anyway, again, lots of "known failures", do these also show up in
4.13-stable?

thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h