Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] tracing: Add support for preempt and irq enable/disable events
From: Joel Fernandes
Date: Wed Oct 04 2017 - 16:13:21 EST
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:56:33 -0700
> Joel Fernandes <joelaf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I don't see the protection in the patches. I will definitely test that
>> > before pushing it anywhere.
>> The protection added by CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING was already there before
>> my patches. I just moved the code around in patch 1/2, nothing changed
>> in that patch. I already tested the combination of PROVE_LOCKING
>> enabled and disabled and several other combinations on your -next
>> tree. It all compiled fine. Here is my test script FWIW:
>> (By the way, do you mean that another tree/branch than your -next or
>> Linus's master has protection removed? If so, could you let me know
>> which tree/branch?)
> Using Linus's master is usually fine, but if you want to see what I'm
> working on, just look at the ftrace/core branch of my linux-trace.git
> tree on kernel.org. Note, that branch often rebases. My for-next branch
> does not.
Got it, thanks.
> Also note, I'm currently looking to pull in Tom Zanussi's hist patch
> series, and then I'll get to yours afterward.
Sounds good, thanks a lot!