[tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem, security/apparmor: Replace homebrew use of write_can_lock() with lockdep

From: tip-bot for Will Deacon
Date: Tue Oct 10 2017 - 07:10:11 EST


Commit-ID: 26c4eb192c6224e5297496cead36404b62fb071b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/26c4eb192c6224e5297496cead36404b62fb071b
Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 19:25:26 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:50:17 +0200

locking/rwsem, security/apparmor: Replace homebrew use of write_can_lock() with lockdep

The lockdep subsystem provides a robust way to assert that a lock is
held, so use that instead of write_can_lock, which can give incorrect
results for qrwlocks.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
security/apparmor/include/lib.h | 11 -----------
security/apparmor/label.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/lib.h b/security/apparmor/include/lib.h
index 436b3a7..f546707 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/lib.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/lib.h
@@ -19,17 +19,6 @@

#include "match.h"

-/* Provide our own test for whether a write lock is held for asserts
- * this is because on none SMP systems write_can_lock will always
- * resolve to true, which is what you want for code making decisions
- * based on it, but wrong for asserts checking that the lock is held
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#define write_is_locked(X) !write_can_lock(X)
-#else
-#define write_is_locked(X) (1)
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-
/*
* DEBUG remains global (no per profile flag) since it is mostly used in sysctl
* which is not related to profile accesses.
diff --git a/security/apparmor/label.c b/security/apparmor/label.c
index c5b99b9..ad28e03 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/label.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/label.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void __aa_proxy_redirect(struct aa_label *orig, struct aa_label *new)

AA_BUG(!orig);
AA_BUG(!new);
- AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&labels_set(orig)->lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&labels_set(orig)->lock);

tmp = rcu_dereference_protected(orig->proxy->label,
&labels_ns(orig)->lock);
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static bool __label_remove(struct aa_label *label, struct aa_label *new)

AA_BUG(!ls);
AA_BUG(!label);
- AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&ls->lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&ls->lock);

if (new)
__aa_proxy_redirect(label, new);
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static bool __label_replace(struct aa_label *old, struct aa_label *new)
AA_BUG(!ls);
AA_BUG(!old);
AA_BUG(!new);
- AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&ls->lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&ls->lock);
AA_BUG(new->flags & FLAG_IN_TREE);

if (!label_is_stale(old))
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static struct aa_label *__label_insert(struct aa_labelset *ls,
AA_BUG(!ls);
AA_BUG(!label);
AA_BUG(labels_set(label) != ls);
- AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&ls->lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&ls->lock);
AA_BUG(label->flags & FLAG_IN_TREE);

/* Figure out where to put new node */