Re: x86/mce: suspicious RCU usage in 4.13.4

[Luck, Tony]

>  	for (;;) {
>  		entry = mce_log_get_idx_check(mcelog.next);

Can't this get even simpler? Do we need the loop? The mutex
will now protect us while we check to see if there is a slot
to stash this new entry. Also just say:

		entry = mcelog.next;

>  		for (;;) {
> @@ -66,10 +67,10 @@ static int dev_mce_log(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  			 * interesting ones:
>  			 */
>  			if (entry >= MCE_LOG_LEN) {
> -				set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW,
> -					(unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags);
> +				set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW, (unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags);

Need to mutex_unlock(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex); here.

>  				return NOTIFY_OK;
>  			}
> +
>  			/* Old left over entry. Skip: */
>  			if (mcelog.entry[entry].finished) {
>  				entry++;
> @@ -77,15 +78,13 @@ static int dev_mce_log(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		smp_rmb();
> -		next = entry + 1;
> -		if (cmpxchg(&mcelog.next, entry, next) == entry)
> -			break;

Ummm. Without this "break" how will we exit the loop (more fuel
for getting rid of the loop.

> +		mcelog.next = entry + 1;
>  	}

-Tony