On 2017/10/12 20:56, Liang, Kan wrote:If evlist->overwrite is always non-overwrite, why not remove it?
idx,On 2017/10/11 21:16, Liang, Kan wrote:
[SNIP]perf record's --overwrite option doesn't work as we expect.
For example:
[SNIP]In the above example we get same records from the backward ring
buffer all the time. Overwriting is not triggered.
This commit maps backward ring buffers readonly, make it overwritable.
It is safe because we assume backward ring buffer always overwritable
in other part of code.
After applying this patch:
$ ~/linux/tools/perf$ sudo ./perf record -m 4 -e raw_syscalls:*
-g -- overwrite \
--switch-output=1s --tail-synthesize dd
if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Liang Kan <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index c6c891e..a86b0d2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -799,12 +799,14 @@ perf_evlist__should_poll(struct perf_evlist
*evlist __maybe_unused,
}
static int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int
perf_evlist__mmap_ex?But how about evlist->overwrite? I think it still keeps the wrong setting.@@ static- struct mmap_params *mp, int cpu_idx,
+ struct mmap_params *_mp, int cpu_idx,
int thread, int *_output, int
*_output_backward)
{
struct perf_evsel *evsel;
int revent;
int evlist_cpu = cpu_map__cpu(evlist->cpus, cpu_idx);
+ struct mmap_params *mp = _mp;
+ struct mmap_params backward_mp;
evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
struct perf_mmap *maps = evlist->mmap; @@ -815,6 +817,9
Not only the per-event overwrite. See the example above. The overall --int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(structSo it's trying to support per-event overwrite.
perf_evlist *evlist, int idx,
if (evsel->attr.write_backward) {
output = _output_backward;
maps = evlist->backward_mmap;
+ backward_mp = *mp;
+ backward_mp.prot &= ~PROT_WRITE;
+ mp = &backward_mp;
if (!maps) {
maps = perf_evlist__alloc_mmap(evlist);
How about the global --overwrite option?
overwrite option is also respected. In perf_evsel__config, per-event evsel
'backward' setting is set based on overall '--overwrite' and per-event
'/overwrite/' setting.
The overwrite is implicitly applied. Some settings are inconsistent.
Is there any drawback if you use opts->overwrite for
We will always face such inconsistency, because we have
an /no-overwrite/ option which can be set per-evsel.
Setting evlist->overwrite won't make things more consistent,
because in a evlist, different evsel can have different
overwrite setting. A simple solution is making evlist
non-overwrite by default, and watch all overwrite evsels
a special cases. Then we have only 2 cases to consider:
1. overwrite evsel in a non-overwrite evlist.
2. non-overwrite evsel in a non-overwrite evlist.