Re: [PATCH 3/8] Documentation: fix ref to workqueue content

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html     | 2 +-

Someone(tm) should convert the last three html files to rst one of these
days!

In the mean time, I guess this is good enough.

BR,
Jani.

>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
> index e5d0bbd0230b..7394f034be65 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ grace period also drove it to completion.
>  This straightforward approach had the disadvantage of needing to
>  account for POSIX signals sent to user tasks,
>  so more recent implemementations use the Linux kernel's
> -<a href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/workqueue.txt";>workqueues</a>.
> +<a href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst";>workqueues</a>.
>  
>  <p>
>  The requesting task still does counter snapshotting and funnel-lock

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center